Legal Opinion

Rhoads v. Rhoads

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1940No. 32,231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

In this divorce action the contesting defendant prevailed. Plaintiff moved for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or for a new trial. After denial, plaintiff appeals.

The 450-page record depicts conflicting testimony that is so characteristic of an action of this nature. Detailed recitation will not aid the bench, the parties, or the bar. The testimony created fact issues which the court could resolve favorably or adversely to plaintiff. While a survey of the record compels the conclusion that plaintiff’s version might well have been accepted, still we are duty…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Locksted v. LockstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API