Legal Opinion
Planning & Conservation League v. Department of Water Resources
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1998No. S058929PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
The Code of Civil Procedure1 provides, in sections 860 to 870, a set of accelerated in rem procedures for determining the validity of certain bonds, assessments and other agreements entered into by public agencies. Among the shortened time periods specified is a 30-day period for appealing from the “judgment” in a validation action. (§ 870, subd. (b).) This 30-day period constitutes an exception from the normal time for filing an *267appeal specified in California Rules of Court, rule 2(a)2 (the earlier of 60 days after notice of entry or 180 days after entry of judgment), and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.