Dodd v. Pasch
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Appeal from judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the possession of certain premises rented of plaintiff by defendants. The complaint was framed upon the theory that the defendants were tenants from month to month and were holding over after one month’s notice terminating their tenancy. Defendants pleaded that they leased the premises for one year ending October 1, 1906, and at the trial introduced in evidence in support thereof a writing signed and delivered to defendants by plaintiff in the words following, to wit:
“Fresno,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Williams v. Ashurst Oil, Land, & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Scott v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lopizich v. SalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Rohan v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Enlow v. IrwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.