Jones v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.
Question inv'olve’d: (1) Will a local improvement petition, required by C. S., 2707, signed by the Southern Railway Company, an abutting owner, which made a majority of all the lineal feet frontage (no question as to their being a majority in number of the owners), the assessment against said railway the city of Durham assumed to pay in a mandamus proceeding to force said railway and others to build an underpass, render an assessment thereunder void as to other abutting property owners in the area who did not sign but had notice of the proceeding, under C. S., 2705, 2712? We think not. See…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Woodruff v. CatlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Brown v. Town of HillsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tarboro v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Austin v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Efird v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- City of High Point v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Arbogast v. . Buncombe CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.