Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Burke v. Badlam

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,663PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, J.:

In this case we are asked by the petitioner, who alleges himself to be a tax-payer of the city and county of San Francisco, to grant a writ of mandate compelling the assessor of the said city and county to assess, upon the assessment roll thereof, to various holders of certificates of stock in various corporations the respective shares held by them, and to assess the various depositors in various savings banks the respective sums of money deposited by them. Whether the assessor has or has not assessed to the respective corporations all of their property of every character, and to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coite v. Society for SavingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  2. State v. Cumberland & Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Flynn v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API