Legal Opinion

State v. Neron

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 26, 1994No. 12312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from the decision of the trial court denying his motion to open1 the trial court’s granting of his application for accelerated rehabilitation. The state asserts that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. It posits that the decision of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to vacate its previous granting of the defendant’s application for accelerated rehabilitation is not a final judgment from which an appeal should have been taken. We agree.

*238“Interlocutory orders and rulings of the Superior Court may be final judgments for purposes of appeal in two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. State v. SpendoliniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. O'ConnellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API