Legal Opinion
State v. O'Connell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 4, 1994No. 13680PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the order of the trial court ordering him to submit to an examination to determine his competency to stand trial pursuant to General Statutes § 54-56d (c).1 The state asserts in its motion to dismiss the appeal that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the order from which the defendant appeals is not a final judgment for purposes of appeal. We agree.
The defendant was arrested on February 26, 1994, and charged with breach of the peace in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181. He was granted accelerated rehabilitation but, on May 6,1994, the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Ackerson v. StramagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. NeronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- AIU Insurance v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Papa v. Thimble Creek Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994