Legal Opinion
State v. Spendolini
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 25, 1983No. 10384PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaeskey, J.
The defendant was charged with the crime of perjury in violation of General Statutes § 53a-156. In this appeal the defendant challenges the court’s denial of his motion for accelerated rehabilitation. Although at an earlier stage of these proceedings we denied the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the state has nevertheless pursued the jurisdictional issue in its brief. Upon reexamination we are persuaded that we have no jurisdiction of the subject matter and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.
Appeals to this court may be taken from final…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.