McCarthy v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action to charge the city of Minneapolis with damage plaintiffs claim to have suffered from the construction of the street railway bridge described in Bruer v. City of Minneapolis, 201 Minn. 40, 275 N. W. 368, wherein we held that the Minneapolis Street Railway was not liable, as a joint tortfeasor, to abutting property owners. The instant case comes here on appeal by plaintiffs from an order sustaining, without leave to plead over, general demurrers to the complaint.
There is no allegation of negligence. The case for plaintiffs reduces itself to a claim that the construction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Willis v. Winona CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Nelson v. McKenzie-hague Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- First National Bank v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Haeussler v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- In Re Town Ditch No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.