Legal Opinion
Murphy v. McIntyre
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1908No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Summary proceedings by Mary L. Murphy against Sarah E. McIntyre for the possession of certain real estate. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and complainant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
On default being made in payments due upon an executory contract for the sale and purchase *592of land, the vendor served upon the vendee in possession a notice containing the following clause:
“I hereby notify you that I have elected to declare and have declared said contract void under the terms thereof, and demand immediate possession of said premises according to the terms of said contract and hereby give you notice to quit and vacate said premises.”
The notice was served September 20,1907, and on October 7, 1907, the vendor made and filed with a circuit court commissioner a complaint in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Lambton Loan & Investment Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Miner v. DickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Benfey v. CongdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Teft v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- E. J. Lander & Co. v. DeemyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. JurczakIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Walker v. BurtlessNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Donnelly v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.