Legal Opinion
Miner v. Dickey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1905No. Docket No. 121PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Summary proceedings by Ida M. Miner against Isaac O. Dickey to recover possession of certain premises. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Complainant is owner of certain premises. Defendant is in possession under a land contract, of which he is assignee, containing the following provisions :
“ Said party of the second part also agrees to pay all taxes and assessments whatsoever that shall be taxed or assessed on said premises, or upon this contract, or upon the contract interest of said first party in and to said premises created by this contract, including the taxes for the year 1901, and hereby waive any and all claim or right against said party of the first part, her legal representatives or assigns, to any payment or rebate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randall v. ChubbMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lewis v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Michigan Land & Iron Co. v. ThoneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Marvin v. HartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Corning v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Murphy v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Donnelly v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Hupp Farm Corp. v. NeefMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.