Legal Opinion

Benfey v. Congdon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. Action to recover possession of rented premises under Comp. L., ch. 211. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Gongdon took proceedings before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of a store which Benfey had held under him by lease. The proceedings were removed to the circuit court by appeal, and the errors relied upon here arise upon exceptions taken on the trial in that court.

*285It appeared without dispute that Benfey had a written lease of the store for one year from July 18, 1876, at a rent of $1,000, and at the end of that time it was agreed between the parties that Benfey should continue to hold the premises at the reduced rent of nine hundred dollars. This agreement was not reduced…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Murphy v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Burton v. LaddMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Landsberg v. Tivoli Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Connell v. ChambersNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API