Teft v. Hinchman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Proceedings to recover possession of premises. Defendants appeal. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action commenced before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of a building.
The commissioner found in favor of the defendants. The complainants appealed to the circuit court for the county of Berrien, in which court, upon trial before a jury, complain-^ ants had verdict and judgment.
The defendants bring the case into this Court by writ of error.
The ownership of the property in complainants was not disputed.
The complainant Teft, who managed the building, went to Kansas in September, 1885. The building was situated at Sawyer, Berrien county. While in Kansas, and in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Murphy v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kokalis v. WhitehurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Ryan v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.