Legal Opinion

Brown v. Jurczak

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1947No. 30148. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The plaintiffs, James E. and Elizabeth M. Brown, filed their amended complaint in the superior court of Cook county against the defendants, Andrew and Filomena Jurczak, seeking specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. Defendants’ motion to strike was sustained, plaintiffs elected to abide by their pleading and judgment was rendered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs.The latter prosecute this appeal, a freehold being necessarily involved. Espadron v. Davis, 385 Ill. 304; Herrick v. Lain, 375 Ill. 569.

Prom the complaint it appears that on and prior to July 21, 1945,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. MacY v. Brown.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Watson v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Miles v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Sanitary District of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Geist v. LehmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Lang v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Laegeler v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Tadros v. KuzmakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Miles Homes, Inc. v. MintjalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API