Legal Opinion

Lierly v. Motor Mtg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1935No. 22473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.

The question presented involves the validity of a judgment recovered from the sureties on a redelivery bond in re-plevin for depreciation in the value of an automobile during the time of its retention.

On December 3, 1930, the Motor Mortgage Company, defendant in error, recovered a judgment against W. E. McDaniel for the possession of a certain automobile in the same condition and free from wear and depreciation as the same was on May 20, 1930, the date of the commencement of the action in replevin, or, in case the same was not delivered, the Motor Mortgage Company was to have judgment against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  2. Gerber v. WehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Fair v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brook v. James A. Cullimore & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wortham v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Buckmaster v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API