Legal Opinion
Brook v. James A. Cullimore & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 26, 1967No. 41583PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
436 P.2d 32 (1967)
Edward E. BROOK, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
JAMES A. CULLIMORE & CO., a co-partnership composed of James A. Cullimore and Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Defendants in Error.
No. 41583.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 26, 1967.
J.B. Beaird, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Dean Williamson, W. Samuel Dykeman, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.
McINERNEY, Justice.
The question dispositive of this appeal is whether in a replevin action the defeated litigant in possession of property whose recovery is sought may 1) elect to retain that property as his own, against the will of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ward v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Sudbury v. DeterdingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- William D. Houghton and Jesse Houghton v. Foremost Financial Services Corp., Formerly Known as Minnehoma Financial Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.