Legal Opinion

Sproat v. Durland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1894PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Et'ror from Oklahoma County.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the case, finding of facts and opinion by

Dale, C. J.:

May 1st, 1893, appellant, Samuel Sproat, applied for and obtained from the district judge of Oklahoma county, sitting at chambers, a temporary restraining order against the appellee, Otto G. Durland, which order restrained said Durland, and all persons acting under him, from in any manner trespassing upon the northeast quarter of section thirty-four, township twelve, north of range three west, or turning any cattle therein, or building any fence thereon, or in any wise interfering with the possession of Sproat in and to said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Sturr v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Webster v. CookeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Bristor v. TaskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Black Lick Mfg. Co. v. Saltsburg Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Woodruff v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Barnes v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API