Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. University National Bank
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 26, 1973No. [No. 70, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
In its simplest form, the question raised by this case is within what period of time may a depositor seek to hold his bank accountable when the bank has honored checks bearing only one signature, drawn on a two-signature account?
Because the appeal is from a summary judgment entered for the bank on the pleadings, affidavit, and depositions, on the ground that there was no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Maryland Rule 610 a 1; White v. Friel, 210 Md. 274, 123 A. 2d 303 (1956), the determination made by the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Taylor v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Union Trust Co. v. SobleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- University National Bank v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- G & R Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. American Security & Trust Company, Max S. Kraft and Oscar MarguliesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Pine Bluff National Bank v. KestersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. SpigenerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.