Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Holman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 68PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

One issue is raised by this appeal: Did the trial court err in ruling that the minor plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently states a cause of action based upon the violation of statute and upon common-law negligence?

The power company essentially alleges plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a cause of action sounding either in per se negligence arising from the violation of a safety statute, or common-law negligence in the placement of a power pole four feet from the roadway. The following oft reiterated rules relating to review of orders overruling or sustaining demurrers are applicable:(1)…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hass v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. LeitnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API