Legal Opinion

Courtesy Temporary Service, Inc. v. Camacho

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1990No. B027238PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

I

Introduction

This is an appeal by Courtesy Temporary Service, Inc., hereinafter “Courtesy,” from an order of the Los Angeles Superior Court partially denying Courtesy’s motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain Leonel Camacho, Maria Camacho, and Bianca Alvarez, former employees of Courtesy, hereafter “Employees,” from soliciting Courtesy’s customers and/or utilizing or disclosing certain confidential proprietary information concerning such customers.

II

Contentions

Courtesy contends that while in Courtesy’s employ, Employees misappropriated Courtesy’s confidential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. American Paper & Packaging Products, Inc. v. KirganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Greenly v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Klamath-Orleans Lumber, Inc. v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Morlife, Inc. v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGSMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
  5. ABBA Rubber Co. v. SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API