Legal Opinion
Klamath-Orleans Lumber, Inc. v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1978No. Civ. 51921PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Plaintiff Klamath-Orleans Lumber, Inc., doing business as Baybarz Binder Company, brought this action against defendants Clarence and Hilda Miller for an injunction and damages for unfair business competition. The Millers are former employees of plaintiff who went into business for themselves and solicited many of plaintiff’s customers. The equitable issues relating to the injunction were tried by the court without a jury. The court granted first a preliminary and then a permanent injunction restraining defendants from soliciting certain of plaintiff’s customers. On the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Morlife, Inc. v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.