Legal Opinion

CRS Recovery, Inc. v. Laxton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2010No. 08-17306PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

This case requires application of traditional choice-of-law, tort, and property principles to an increasingly common factual setting, a dispute over the ownership of an Internet domain name. John Laxton *1140(“Laxton”) and his assignee North Bay Real Estate, Inc. appeal the adverse summary judgment for Dale Mayberry (“May-berry”) and his assignee CRS Recovery, Inc. (“CRS”). The district court was correct to apply California law, but we find disputed issues of material fact and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Background Facts

On July 23, 1995, Mayberry, a citizen of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Godun v. Justanswer LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Network Services Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API