Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bed Rock Tunnel & Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, Nevada County. This action was commenced December 13th, 1867. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, J. :

This is an action to recover the possession of certain mining ground called the Monte Christo Claims. The defenses, so far as they illustrate the grounds of the appeal, are: First— A denial of the plaintiffs’ title; and Second—Forfeiture of their title under the mining rules and regulations of the district in which the Monte Christo Claims are situated. In the Court below judgment passed for the defendant. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was denied, and then appealed.

Two points are made by appellant. First—Error of the Court in excluding certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. McGarrity v. ByingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. St. John v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
  2. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Last Chance Min. Co. v. Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  5. Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API