Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2010No. 08-16075PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
The State of Arizona and Plaintiff-Intervenors Frederick Lindstrom and Larry Wanger brought this suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and the Arizonans with Disabilities Act (“AzDA”), Ariz.Rev. Stat., §§ 41-1492-41-1492.11, to remedy what they allege are discriminatory accommodations at movie theaters owned by Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. and its affiliates (“Harkins”). Plaintiffs contend that Harkins’s failure to provide (1) open or closed captioning for hearing impaired patrons and (2) audio descriptions of a movie’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Brian Whitaker v. Tesla Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- J.D. by Doherty v. Colonial Williamsburg Found.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.