Legal Opinion

Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1954No. Civ. 15955PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting a new trial after a verdict in their favor. The action is for damages for malpractice. Plaintiffs are Hazel Shipley, the patient, and her husband; as defendants there remain after certain changes pending suit the Permanente Hospital, a corporation; Permanente Health Plan, a nonprofit trust and Dr. J. G. Hallett. It was the position of plaintiffs that Mrs. Shipley submitted herself to Permanente Health Plan and Permanente Hospital for treatment of a back injury caused by a fall from a chair, that defendant Hallett and his assistants, as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. People v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API