State v. Medlin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant having been given a sentence in excess of the presumptive term, his appeal is as a matter of right. G.S. 15A-1444(al). On such an appeal, the only question before the appellate court is whether the sentence is supported by the evidence presented at trial and the sentencing hearing. Id. The factors found must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. G.S. 15A-1340.4(a).
*253The trial judge found two factors in aggravation: (1) “that the offense was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel in that it was done without provocation while the victim was on the ground; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. VaughtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.