Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Mautner v. Quattrone

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1989No. A043063PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

The District Attorney of Napa County, on behalf of the People of the State of California, unsuccessfully sued, under the Unfair Business Practices Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200), to bar defendant from selling certain knives, claiming they were illegal switchblades (Pen. Code, § 653k). We hold that the butterfly and “Tekna” knives are prohibited switchblades and reverse the judgment below.

The People brought an action alleging unfair business practices against John R. Quattrone, doing business as Honest John’s Sports Emporium, arising out of the sale or offer-for-sale of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Stewart A. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Cutlery Mfg. Co. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiddallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. Gilbert R.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. State v. StrangeCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  4. State v. RiddallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API