Legal Opinion

State v. Riddall

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1991No. 11928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions of unlawful possession of a switchblade and unlawful carrying of a deadly weapon. On appeal, defendant has raised five issues. The first two concern NMSA 1978, Section 30-7-8 (Repl.Pamp.1984), which makes the possession of “switchblades” unlawful. They are: (1) whether a butterfly knife is a switchblade within the meaning of that section, and (2) whether Section 30-7-8 is unconstitutionally vague. The other issues raised on appeal include (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing a police officer to demonstrate the knife as part of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Miller v. New Mexico Department of TransportationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Deats v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  4. Archibeque v. MoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API