Legal Opinion
J.S. v. Shoreline School District
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 21, 2002No. C01-1527RPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
On August 31, 2001, Administrative Law Judge Jill L. Geary issued an order finding that parents J.S. and T.S. were not entitled to reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act for the placement of their child, C.S., at a residential school in Montana. The parents filed the present action under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(2)(A), seeking review of that decision. Having reviewed the administrative record, the ALJ’s findings of fact, conclusions of law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Daniel Lenn, Etc. v. Portland School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- J.S. v. Scarsdale Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Cippolone v. Hoffmeier, C-060482 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hester v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.