Hester v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Antonio Hester, brings this suit alleging that Defendants, the District of Columbia and Robert C. Rice, Superintendent of the District of Columbia Public Schools, failed to provide him with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) as required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 14, et seq. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, [# 14], and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, [# 16]. Upon consideration of the Motions, Oppositions, and Replies, and the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Powers-Bunce v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Powers-Bunce v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hester v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Brown v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Seth v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018