Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Levi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. DA360279; CA A50617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for loitering to solicit prostitution. Portland City Code 14.24.050. She assigns as error the trial court’s denial of her motions for judgment of acquittal and arrest of judgment. We affirm.

Sometime after 11:00 p.m., a police officer, who was the only witness at trial, observed defendant standing with two other women near a street corner in an area that the officer characterized as a “high vice area” where a “lot of prostitutes” worked. In the past, defendant had admitted to the officer that she was a prostitute. The officer told the women to go home, which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Portland v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. City of Portland v. LeviCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. City of Portland v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. City of Portland v. DeskinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API