Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Deskins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. DA393461-8905; CA A62396Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for loitering to solicit prostitution. Portland City Code 14.24.050. We affirm.

Defendant argues, first, that the trial court erred in overruling her demurrer to the complaint on the ground that Portland City Code 14.24.050 has been preempted by state statute. We recently answered that argument adversely to her position in City of Portland v. Potts, 103 Or App 548, 799 P2d 168 (1990).1

In her second assignment of error, defendant asserts that the trial court should have granted her demurrer on the ground that the ordinance is vague in violation of Article I,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. City of Portland v. LeviCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. City of Portland v. LeviCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. City of Portland v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API