City of Portland v. Levi

Defendant petitions for review of our decision, 98 Or App 341, 779 P2d 192 (1989), which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. She contends that we erred in determining that the Portland ordinance that she violated is not vague, in violation of Article I, sections 20 and 21, of the Oregon Constitution. We deny reconsideration of that holding.

She also contends that we erred by upholding the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquittal. She argues that we relied on evidence which the trial court did not admit at trial. We said:

“In the past, defendant had…