Legal Opinion

State v. Krueger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 0208-48646, 0211-53303 A122970 (Control), A122971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In these consolidated cases, defendant appeals two judgments of conviction for unlawful prostitution activities, Portland City Code (PCC) 14A.40.050. She assigns error to the overruling of her demurrer to the complaints, arguing that PCC 14A.40.050 is unconstitutional because it is preempted by state statute and is impermissibly vague. We affirm.

Because this case comes to us on a demurrer, the facts underlying the citations are not relevant. State v. Illig-Renn, 341 Or 228, 230 n 2, 142 P3d 62 (2006). Defendant was cited for violating PCC 14A.40.050, which provides, in pertinent part, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ChakerianOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Corvallis v. Pi Kappa PhiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Ceaser v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Richardson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API