Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Potts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1990No. DA387019; CA A60323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for loitering to solicit prostitution. Portland City Code 14.24.050. We affirm.

Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds that Portland City Code 14.24.050 has been preempted by ORS 167.007, ORS 161.405 and ORS 167.012, in that it requires less culpability than that required by those statutes, and that the ordinance is vague and, therefore, violates Article I, sections 20 and 21, of the Oregon Constitution. The demurrer was overruled. She also moved to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the arrest, which was denied. The city called only one…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. VannessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. DeskinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. City of Portland v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API