Legal Opinion

April v. Peront

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiff testified that he first consulted the defendant on February 16, 1931; that a tooth had bothered him for about a week and that he went to the defendant’s office on that occasion not only to have that tooth extracted but to have the defendant examine all his teeth and do “whatever there was to be done.” It was the first time he had been to a dentist for treatment in five years.

The defendant, after his examination, expressed the opinion that two teeth (a lower right and an upper left) would have to come out. He extracted these teeth and then dismissed the plaintiff with directions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Rising v. VeatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Krueger v. ChaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Eggert v. DramburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Carbone v. WarburtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Folger v. CorbettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Michael v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API