Legal Opinion
Automobile Insurance v. Conlon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the company, founded upon a claim of unjust enrichment.
The defendant, John W. Conlon, was insured by the company under a $50 deductible policy of collision insurance in the standard form. The policy provided: “In the event of any payment under this policy the Company shall be subrogated to all the Insured’s rights of recovery therefor against any person or organization and the Insured shall execute and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights. The Insured…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Regan v. N. York and N. England R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Complete Health, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Sargeant v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 478 Health Benefits & Insurance FundDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.