Sargeant v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 478 Health Benefits & Insurance Fund
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
I.Facts and Procedural History
On February 29, 1984, plaintiff, spouse of Richard Sargeant, a member of the defendant’s health benefit plan (the “Fund”), received injuries as a result of a slip and fall at a Burger King. Plaintiffs Statement of the Facts, ¶ 1; Defendant’s Statement of the Facts, 118. The Fund, a self-insured plan subject to federal regulation in accordance with 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”)), paid a total of $31,067.82 for the plaintiff’s medical, surgical,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Serembus Ex Rel. UIU Health & Welfare Fund v. MathwigDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Carpenter v. Modern Drop Forge Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.