Legal Opinion

Sargeant v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 478 Health Benefits & Insurance Fund

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 17, 1990No. Civ. H-89-457 (PCD)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

I.Facts and Procedural History

On February 29, 1984, plaintiff, spouse of Richard Sargeant, a member of the defendant’s health benefit plan (the “Fund”), received injuries as a result of a slip and fall at a Burger King. Plaintiffs Statement of the Facts, ¶ 1; Defendant’s Statement of the Facts, 118. The Fund, a self-insured plan subject to federal regulation in accordance with 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”)), paid a total of $31,067.82 for the plaintiff’s medical, surgical,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Serembus Ex Rel. UIU Health & Welfare Fund v. MathwigDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Carpenter v. Modern Drop Forge Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API