Legal Opinion
Hamilton Fire Insurance v. Greger
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1927PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
Upon motion of the plaintiff, summary judgment has been entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Maurice N. Greger, for the recovery of the sum of two thousand dollars which the plaintiff had previously paid to the defendant under a policy of insurance issued by it. Under the terms of the policy, the insurance company agreed to indemnify the defendant Greger against loss by reason of the destruction of an automobile owned by him. On or about April 1st, 1923, the automobile was destroyed in a collision with a train operated by the defendant New York, Susquehanna and Western…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Vooth v. . McEachenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Sims v. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of La PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Kieron Mazzola and First Fidelity L.S. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.