Legal Opinion
People v. Ahalt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the procedure employed by the trial court in trying him and his codefendant, Carl Campbell, together before separate juries was unauthorized and prejudicial. We are satisfied that the trial court adopted that procedure only after a full consideration of the effect the procedure would have on defendant’s due process rights and after thorough precautions were taken to protect those rights (see, People v Ricardo B., 73 NY2d 228).
Defendant failed to preserve for review the alleged error in the composition of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Ricardo B.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. AhaltNew York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. ChavysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. District Court of Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. SinklerNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.