Legal Opinion

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s application for authorization to obtain an investigator at county expense (see, County Law § 722-c) because defendant failed to make the required showing of necessity to justify the request (see, Johnson v Harris, 682 F2d 49, 50-51, cert denied 459 US 1041; People v Filomeno, 138 AD2d 734, 735, lv denied 71 NY2d 1026; People v Pride, 79 Misc 2d 581, 582-583). Defendant’s claim regarding the court’s submission to the jury of a summary of the statutory elements of each crime charged in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. NimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. CousartNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. PrideNew York Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CamarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. AhaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API