Legal Opinion

People v. District Court of Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 13, 1992No. 92SA168PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

At the request of the People of the State of Colorado (the People), this court issued a rule to show cause why this court should not issue a Writ of Mandamus requiring respondent district court to empanel a jury in People v. Bath, No. 91CR1660, and in People v. Giardina, No. 91CR1658. The People assert that the defendants must first obtain the People’s consent before waiving their right to trial by jury pursuant to section 16-10-101, 8A C.R.S. (1992 Supp.). The People also assert that section 16-10-101 is constitutional. We conclude that the prosecution cannot compel trial by jury where an…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. People v. BartowsheskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People Ex Rel. Daley v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MahurinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. RobinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. ClouseColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. People v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API