Legal Opinion

People v. Sinkler

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*104OPINION OF THE COURT

Donald J. Mark, J.

This is an application by the defendant’s attorney, pursuant to County Law § 722-b, seeking compensation in the amount of $2,336.50, consisting of $1,604 for in-court time and $732.50 for out-of-court time, for his representation of an indigent defendant charged with the crimes of attempted robbery, first degree, and assault in the second degree. Counsel claims he is entitled to reimbursement in excess of the statutory limit of $1,200 because of extraordinary circumstances.

Many attorneys tend to equate the time expended in the defense of their indigent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Werfel v. AgrestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. People v. GarrowHamilton County Court · 1975
  4. Montgomery v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Byrnes v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BrismanNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re Dutchess County Department of Social Services ex rel. Anthony S.New York City Family Court · 2001
  3. People v. FortuneNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. Toms, New York County Courts2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API