Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2009No. 38 EAP 2007PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted allowance of appeal in this case to consider whether the Commonwealth Court expanded improperly the limited scope of review applicable to an Act 1111 grievance *273arbitration by holding that an arbitrator violated the City of Philadelphia’s procedural due process rights when the arbitrator precluded the City from presenting any evidence because of the City’s failure to comply with a duly issued subpoena. After careful consideration, we agree with the Commonwealth Court that the arbitrator violated the City’s due process rights. Thus, the Commonwealth Court did not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Saint Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem v. VivianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Fratzola v. Klepadlo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2012
  5. Stepanovich v. McGrawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API