Legal Opinion
Boyne v. Town of Glastonbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 30, 2008No. AC 29150PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Paul Boyne, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, the town of Glastonbury. The plaintiff filed a five count complaint against the defendant, primarily seeking injunctive relief, and the court rendered summaiy judgment as to all five counts. The plaintiff now claims that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because (1) its legal conclusions were improper with respect to four of the five counts 1 and (2) certain material facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Keller v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Rickel v. KomaromiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Sinotte v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Shukis v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF REGIONAL DIST.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.