Legal Opinion
Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1980No. 49988PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
The Department of Human Rights (Department) appeals from the decision of the district court reversing the hearing examiner’s decision that Willie Ruth Hawkins’ employer, Continental Can Co. (Continental), discriminated against her on the basis of sex with respect to her conditions of employment.
Judicial review of the decision of the Department of Human Rights is governed by Minn.Stat. § 15.0425 (1978), the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act.
We must determine whether the hearing examiner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether his decision that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Paulette L. Barnes v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Lois E. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.