Legal Opinion

In Re Dixon

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2000No. 99-BG-56 & 00-BG-122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Samuel E. Dixon, Jr., was disciplined by the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of New Haven (“the Connecticut Court”), on October 15, 1998, for appropriating money to himself as payment for legal fees in a probate matter without authorization, commingling personal funds with client funds, failing to promptly deliver funds to a client, failing to keep accurate accounting records, creating a conflict of interest, being dishonest with other attorneys and with the court, and other ethical violations. The Connecticut Court imposed a two-year suspension and conditioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. In Re BlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re HerndonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re CloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re StuartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In re LadasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API