Legal Opinion

In Re Bland

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2000No. 99-BG-1070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 11, 1999, the Virginia State Bar issued two public reprimands of respondent Paul C. Bland, who is also a member of our bar, and required him to comply with certain terms and conditions. 1 The first reprimand stemmed from respondent’s negligent handling of a lawsuit and failure to comply "with record-keeping requirements. Specifically, respondent repeatedly failed to do what was necessary to accomplish service by publication, and then failed to take steps to move the case along. 2 In addition to his public reprimand, respondent was directed to withdraw from the representation and refund…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re BlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re DixonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re ParshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In re LadasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API