Legal Opinion
In re Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 2002No. 01-BG-563PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The Maryland Court of Appeals disbarred respondent Dana W. Johnson after concluding that he “repeatedly engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation” in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) and also violated Rules 1.7(b) (conflict of interest), 3.3(a)(1) (candor toward the tribunal), 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law) and 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), among other rules. Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 363 Md. 598, 770 A.2d 130, 151 (2001). Among other things, Johnson filed a bankruptcy petition…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- In Re DixonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re RichardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re AyeniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re Dana W. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016