Legal Opinion

Hincks v. Robert Mitchell Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 24, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.

[¶ 1] The insurers, Great American Insurance Co. and Maine Employers’ Mutual Insurance Co. (“MEMIC”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, granting the employee’s petitions relating to work-injuries that occurred in 1985 and 1994. The insurers challenge the retroactive application of 39-A M.R.S.A. § 201(6) (Supp.1998), the apportionment of liability between insurers pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 354 (Supp.1998), and the inclusion of fringe benefits in the employee’s average weekly wage. We vacate that decision.

[¶ 2] The employee, Peter Hincks, suffered two injuries while…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Appeal of GagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Ricci v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Arsenault v. J.A. Thurston Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. Coulombe v. Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API