Hincks v. Robert Mitchell Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.
[¶ 1] The insurers, Great American Insurance Co. and Maine Employers’ Mutual Insurance Co. (“MEMIC”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, granting the employee’s petitions relating to work-injuries that occurred in 1985 and 1994. The insurers challenge the retroactive application of 39-A M.R.S.A. § 201(6) (Supp.1998), the apportionment of liability between insurers pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 354 (Supp.1998), and the inclusion of fringe benefits in the employee’s average weekly wage. We vacate that decision.
[¶ 2] The employee, Peter Hincks, suffered two injuries while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Appeal of GagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Ricci v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Arsenault v. J.A. Thurston Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Coulombe v. Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.